REMEMBER: When your state tells you they are replacing/getting rid of Common Core it is nothing more than a registered brand name. You can get rid of the name but still have the standards. They might be tweaked but they will definitely be aligned with Common Core. ESSA has embedded CC aligned standards into federal law. So unless your state is willing to give up the federal money they WILL comply just like every other state must do that "supposedly" has repealed Common Core. ESSA requires the Superintendent to approve state standards or run the risk of losing federal funds.
Former governor of Arkansas and presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee told the CCSSO to never abandon the CCSS but to "REBRAND/RENAME" it and in time parents would forget all about Common Core by that name and accept the education being presented as is. So numerous states did exactly that and you must remember - the "Every Student Success Act" (ESSA) of 2015 has embedded the CCSS within that legislation. States who told you they repealed CC might have "repealed" the name, but the standards at this point are here to stay no matter what their name is. ESSA requires the Superintendent to approve state standards or run the risk of losing federal funds.
Former governor of Arkansas and presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee told the CCSSO to never abandon the CCSS but to "REBRAND/RENAME" it and in time parents would forget all about Common Core by that name and accept the education being presented as is. So numerous states did exactly that and you must remember - the "Every Student Success Act" (ESSA) of 2015 has embedded the CCSS within that legislation. States who told you they repealed CC might have "repealed" the name, but the standards at this point are here to stay no matter what their name is. ESSA requires the Superintendent to approve state standards or run the risk of losing federal funds.
EVEN THOUGH ANITA'S HOGE'S TESTIMONY WAS GIVEN IN PENNSYLVANIA, IT APPLIES TO ALL STATES AS TO WHAT THE ESEA IS MEANT TO DO WHICH INCLUDED THE DATA MINING, FERPA AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILING.
PRIVATE SCHOOLS EQUITABLE SERVICES under the ESEA
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), states that every state educational agency (SEA) must designate an ombudsman to monitor and enforce equitable services requirements to help ensure equitable services and other benefits for eligible private school children, teachers and other educational personnel, and families. The equitable services ombudsman is the state’s primary point of contact for addressing questions and concerns pertaining to the equitable services requirements under Title I and Title VIII of ESEA, as amended by ESSA.
The responsibilities of Florida’s equitable services ombudsman include:
The responsibilities of Florida’s equitable services ombudsman include:
- Assisting in preparing local educational agencies, community-based organizations, colleges, universities, and private schools for effective implementation of ESSA equitable services requirements.
- Providing technical assistance to the department subrecipients by attending consultations, as needed, generating templates and best practices, educating all parties about the legal requirements of the consultation process, etc.
- Proposing appropriate policies and procedures for adoption by the department for implementing, monitoring and enforcing ESSA requirements for equitable participation.
- Ensuring proper implementation of ESSA laws and regulations and resolving complaints using a timely and well-defined process.
- Monitoring and reviewing SEA and subrecipient consultation paperwork, and proportionate share budgets.
- Preparing and widely distributing annual reports on private school participation in ESSA programs in Florida, analyzing and interpreting trends, and proposing solutions to issues identified.
Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.
essa_2015.pdf | |
File Size: | 1061 kb |
File Type: |
FDOE MERGING COMMON CORE, OBAMACARE AND HILLARY CARE
Social-Emotional Learning: States Collaborate to Craft Standards, Policies
By Anita Hoge
Let me introduce you to HillaryCare in our schools, 2016. It's all about ESSA.
As the political campaign heats up and the school year starts in a few weeks, there is an immediate concern that most parents may NOT be aware of... the inclusion of mental health standards in the Common Core agenda. There were many inclusions in the Every Student Succeeds Act, ESSA, with the addition of non-academic standards including attitudes, values, beliefs, and dispositions. The legislation lays out an extreme system of interventions that would change a child's personality or affect. [Affective domain meaning attitudes, values, beliefs (spiritual) and dispositions.] I've been alerting parents to these psych standards for some time. But there's more...
The controversy which most parents are not aware of when standards move to the affective domain (personality traits) is that the government will set proficiency standards for your child's personality, validate and create curriculum, and use invasive psychological techniques to make sure your child changes to that behavior. The questions of: who set those standards, how will they be assessed or measured, who decided how they would be scored, and how will my child be remediated toward those goals, become a glaring reality in the classroom. This is mental health indoctrination. Do parents have a right to opt out of the entire law?
And then, there's the data. Data collection (tracking), datamining (trafficking) and data evaluation (NCES/IES) of these Common Core psychological personality traits which have become glaringly obvious. The advertising and marketing for social, emotional, and behavioral (grit) standards and interventions have allowed third party contractors to successfully access Obama's EO 12866 loophole in FERPA, ALLOWING businesses, foundations, universities, and contractors (who get the data for free) to develop the mental health curriculum, software, and phone apps. This is big business. But sadly, our children have become a commodity. It is imperative that it be stopped.
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/rulesforengagement/2016/08/social-emotional_learning_states_collaborate_to_craft_standards_policies.html
But there is something most parents are NOT thinking of when this progressive agenda moves into mental health. Are you thinking about the changes that your school must make to be able to accommodate children when they are pushed into this individualized, personalized mental health system? The results are NOT academic antidotes. ESSA mandates psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, support teams, you name it. ESSA provides access to outside mental health contractors, as well. Mental health at school should conjure nightmares knowing your children are captive in the classroom.
Which brings me back to the political campaign of Hillary Clinton.
In the next few days I will be sending historical documentation about #CrookedHillary and her subversive push for this entire mental health agenda when she was First Lady under the scheme of HillaryCare. The passage of ESSA, Every Student Succeeds Act that Congress has legislated, IS the entire mental health agenda that Hillary and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation had piloted and modeled in Pennsylvania in the mid 1990's. Former Governor Lamar Alexander (currently Republican Senator and Committee Chairman who pushed the passage of ESSA) was a keynote speaker at the National Governor's Conference in 1989 spouting this "womb to workplace" New American School. The Farrell PA School District was presented at that conference as the School of the 21st Century, " A Prescription for America." This did not go un-noticed. A complete investigation of mental health pushed in the schools was investigated by former Rep. Sam Rohrer (PA-R). A formal summary was finalized in a year and a half study, but the Pennsylvania Assembly stalled on the information and did nothing.
Let me introduce you to HillaryCare in our schools, 2016. It's all about ESSA.
As the political campaign heats up and the school year starts in a few weeks, there is an immediate concern that most parents may NOT be aware of... the inclusion of mental health standards in the Common Core agenda. There were many inclusions in the Every Student Succeeds Act, ESSA, with the addition of non-academic standards including attitudes, values, beliefs, and dispositions. The legislation lays out an extreme system of interventions that would change a child's personality or affect. [Affective domain meaning attitudes, values, beliefs (spiritual) and dispositions.] I've been alerting parents to these psych standards for some time. But there's more...
The controversy which most parents are not aware of when standards move to the affective domain (personality traits) is that the government will set proficiency standards for your child's personality, validate and create curriculum, and use invasive psychological techniques to make sure your child changes to that behavior. The questions of: who set those standards, how will they be assessed or measured, who decided how they would be scored, and how will my child be remediated toward those goals, become a glaring reality in the classroom. This is mental health indoctrination. Do parents have a right to opt out of the entire law?
And then, there's the data. Data collection (tracking), datamining (trafficking) and data evaluation (NCES/IES) of these Common Core psychological personality traits which have become glaringly obvious. The advertising and marketing for social, emotional, and behavioral (grit) standards and interventions have allowed third party contractors to successfully access Obama's EO 12866 loophole in FERPA, ALLOWING businesses, foundations, universities, and contractors (who get the data for free) to develop the mental health curriculum, software, and phone apps. This is big business. But sadly, our children have become a commodity. It is imperative that it be stopped.
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/rulesforengagement/2016/08/social-emotional_learning_states_collaborate_to_craft_standards_policies.html
But there is something most parents are NOT thinking of when this progressive agenda moves into mental health. Are you thinking about the changes that your school must make to be able to accommodate children when they are pushed into this individualized, personalized mental health system? The results are NOT academic antidotes. ESSA mandates psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, support teams, you name it. ESSA provides access to outside mental health contractors, as well. Mental health at school should conjure nightmares knowing your children are captive in the classroom.
Which brings me back to the political campaign of Hillary Clinton.
In the next few days I will be sending historical documentation about #CrookedHillary and her subversive push for this entire mental health agenda when she was First Lady under the scheme of HillaryCare. The passage of ESSA, Every Student Succeeds Act that Congress has legislated, IS the entire mental health agenda that Hillary and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation had piloted and modeled in Pennsylvania in the mid 1990's. Former Governor Lamar Alexander (currently Republican Senator and Committee Chairman who pushed the passage of ESSA) was a keynote speaker at the National Governor's Conference in 1989 spouting this "womb to workplace" New American School. The Farrell PA School District was presented at that conference as the School of the 21st Century, " A Prescription for America." This did not go un-noticed. A complete investigation of mental health pushed in the schools was investigated by former Rep. Sam Rohrer (PA-R). A formal summary was finalized in a year and a half study, but the Pennsylvania Assembly stalled on the information and did nothing.
"It's not that we care about children...It is the Money and Power it gurantees"!
Dr. Peg Luksik Explains the 2015 Every Student Succeeds Act